New Yorker columnist Sy Hersh reports on Bush's covert funding of violent Sunni groups, saying "We are simply in a situation where this president is... using money that was not authorized by Congress, supporting groups indirectly that are involved with the same people that did 9/11."
This is a very significant news break within the mainstream media, because it now opens discussions into false flag terrorism and how it was started and how it has impacted our life today.
The following is a quote from Digg member CloakandSwagger, who summarizes the significance of this news piece by reflecting on the history of the U.S. Government using terrorist groups to serve its own needs and accomplish its own objectives at the expense of many lives.
"This is an important revelation since it reconnects us with our history of funding the Afghan Mujahideen, of which Osama Bin Laden played a major part when pushing back the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan during the 1980s.
All the while, Osama Bin Laden remained a CIA and Pakistani ISI asset, since the US was funneling money via the CIA in cooperation with the Pakistani ISI to accomplish its objectives in that region without getting their hands dirty.
Think of it as "outsourced freedom fighting".
Or maybe even "outsourced terrorism".
The mujahideen later had offshoots which transformed and organized into Al Qaeda.
And that is why you sometimes see the term "Al CIAda" get thrown around.
Because by monetary extension, the CIA not only formed Al Qaeda, they had control over the number one guy, Osama Bin Laden.
It doesn't stop there though.
During the 1990's the Pakistani ISI served as middle man channeling money and other weaponry on behalf of the CIA to fund Mujahideen mercenaries for the Bosnian Muslim Army in the civil war in Yugoslavia and manufactured its way from Bosnia into Kosovo with the complicity of NATO and the US State Department. Mujahideen mercenaries from the Middle East and Central Asia were recruited to fight in the ranks of the Kosovo Liberation Army in the late 1990's in support of NATO's war efforts.
As the timeline drifts towards 2001, 9/11 immediately comes to mind.
And we are often fed the same old rhetoric regarding Osama's connection to 9/11 without looking at the history and its extreme importance in this matter.
It's imperative to look deeper into what was happening behind the scenes among many of the aforementioned players, with ongoing support from the Pakistani ISI.
Ask yourself why the 9/11 commission didn't follow up on the $100,000.00 dollars that was wired from Pakistan to Mohamed Atta
Or on the correlating significance of why Pakistan's chief spy Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad also happened to be in the U.S. during the time of the attacks.
Some people yell "blowback".
Others yell "false flag".
Unfortunately, there are still people don't yell anything at all, and they just accept what the mainstream media has been force feeding them from the government sponsored script." - CloakandSwagger
Also noted by another Digg member, BSGAdama, George Bush may have to reflect on some of his own words from the past in order to decide what course of action should be taken on this matter...
"Any government that supports, protects or harbours terrorists is complicit in the murder of the innocent and equally guilty of terrorist crimes." -- George W. Bush
"Any outlaw regime that has ties to terrorist groups or seeks to possess weapons of mass destruction is a grave danger to the civilised world and will be confronted." --George W. Bush
read more |
digg story
